By Tak Jae Hak
Few days ago, we, the students of Samcheonpo high school, had a
debate in which the topic was which leadership style is better, Servant
leadership or Charisma leadership. The Debate focused on how participants
listen narrowly the opposing argument. Although I won fourth grade, I listened
the debate carefully.
Servant
leader, Charisma leader, what do you think about these words? They are
different leaders who guide and develop their groups.
These
days, it is said that whether groups live or disappear depends on the ability
of the leaders.
Thus,
their management gets more important than the past. Then, what is the
difference between servant and charisma leadership?
Servant
leadership debate had about ten features. These are listening, empathy,
healing, stewardship, commitment to the growth of people, building community,
and so on. Listening is respect for others, and understanding with acceptable
attitude. Empathy is called understanding with high dimension. It helps
recognize the emotions of other people, leads them by knowing what they need
through it.
Healing teaches the leader what problem they treating. Stewardship
means he or she must manage the group and volunteer. Many celebrities, Albert
Schweitzer, Theresa, Mahatma Gandhi, are Servant leaders.
Charisma
leadership makes the members follow their leader dutifully. Charisma leader
express their vision exactly. He or she forms condition which aims cooperation
and mutual relationship. Though the result from them is often good and
satisfactory, he or she seldom responds that positively. However, charisma
leader change the construction into what he wants to make using his authority.
At Final round, the team named 'Jeong Dap Sa Hwe' won the first
prize in front of all students. They stressed servant leadership, claiming
their opinions exactly. Their debate also taught me why listening hard is very
important when saying our suggestions.
No comments:
Post a Comment